<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
Hi Fin,<br>
<br>
Thanks for confirming this. <br>
<br>
As you may know, we do maintain a GRCh37 database - it is not
updated as frequently as the GRCh38 database but it does have the
ExAC data from dbSNP144. For example, rs759080255 is available here:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://grch37.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Variation/Population?db=core;r=13:23929517-23930517;v=rs759080255;vdb=variation;vf=79006210">http://grch37.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Variation/Population?db=core;r=13:23929517-23930517;v=rs759080255;vdb=variation;vf=79006210</a><br>
<br>
Best wishes,<br>
<br>
Sarah<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/01/2016 09:26, Fin Swimmer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:569A0CAF.70807@need-login.de" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello Sarah,<br>
thank you for your answer. I sended an email directly to ExAC.
That was the answer:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Hello!<br>
</div>
<span style="font-size:12.8px">rs759080255 is new as of dbSNP
144, while ExAC is annotated up to dbSNP 142. We recommend
searching by chromosome and position for best results.</span></blockquote>
So it is like you guess. The ExAC site has not been updated with
the latest rs ids. But searching by chromosome and position
working well. One must only consider that Ensembl uses GRCh38
while ExAC still uses GRCh37.<br>
<br>
fin swimmer <br>
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, helvetica,
sans-serif; font-size: 11.3333px; font-style: normal;
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing:
normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align:
center; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space:
normal; widows: 1; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important;
float: none; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"></span><br>
Am 13.01.2016 um 12:16 schrieb Sarah Hunt:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:569631F2.3080304@ebi.ac.uk" type="cite"> <br>
Hi Fin, <br>
<br>
We import these frequencies from the ExAC submissions to dbSNP.
You can see the dbSNP record for rs759080255 here: <br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?searchType=adhoc_search&type=rs&rs=rs759080255">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?searchType=adhoc_search&type=rs&rs=rs759080255</a>
<br>
<br>
I don't know why the same information is not available through
the ExAC site. It could be that the ExAC site has not been
updated with the latest rs ids, or it could be that some
variants will be withdrawn from dbSNP, though this is less
likely. <br>
<br>
Best wishes, <br>
<br>
Sarah <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Dev@ensembl.org">Dev@ensembl.org</a>
Posting guidelines and subscribe/unsubscribe info: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ensembl.org/mailman/listinfo/dev">http://lists.ensembl.org/mailman/listinfo/dev</a>
Ensembl Blog: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ensembl.info/">http://www.ensembl.info/</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>